* * *
The Blindness of the Historical Sciences
Otfried Weise, January 9, 2020
Prophecies are considered imprecise and risky unless only approximate
trends are given and no exact numbers. In contrast, the historically
oriented sciences – history, archaeology, anthropology, earth history,
etc. – claim to be able to provide relatively accurate data. After all,
scientists and laymen alike assume that the past is, at least in
principle, irrevocable, so to say “engraved in stone” in the
archeological artifacts they dig out, apart from the errors due to
incorrect classifications or inadequacies of measurement methods. Is
this really the case?
First of all, let us look at the method of time measurement. It is
based on the course of the sun and moon and leads to various calendar
systems that seem to be compatible with each other. However, numerous
articles and books are published again and again showing that the usual
time calculation is anything but exact and that certain periods of
history are skipped. This is particularly noticeable in the context of
the history of man, which, pressed into a rigid corset, excludes
everything that does not fit into the established doctrine. The books ”Forbidden Archeology: The Full Unabridged Edition: The Hidden History of the Human Race” by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson and ”Lexikon der verbotenen Geschichte: Verheimlichte Entdeckungen von A bis Z” by Luc Bürgin are representative in this respect.
If one follows the division of prehistory and early history into
Stone Age, Bronze Age, Iron Age and numerous subdivisions, then the
Egyptian pyramids must have been built with copper and bronze tools (here) …
If one writes into Google search: ”Forbidden archaeology, what is
science hiding” you get more than 2 million entries … for ”forbidden
archaeology” one gets 4.55 million entries…
The five-volume work: ”History: Fiction of Science?”
by Dr. Anatoly T. Fomenko, Dr. Gleb V. Nosovskiy, et al. shows that
much of the history taught today is made up or manipulated. The work
contains the results of 40 years of meticulous and extensive research
(see also “Maps and Coins vs. History“, volume 17 by the same authors).
The renowned historian Heinz Quirin and Hans-Ulrich Niemitz,
professor for the history of technology at the University of Leipzig,
speak of a large-scale forgery campaign by the church, which in the
Middle Ages had all documents destroyed or manipulated. Hundreds of
monks were busy in the Vatican and numerous monasteries writing on
parchments and invented 300 phantom years with popes and emperors who
never lived.
The Munich systems theoretician Heribert Illig has explored the early Middle Ages in detail in his books “Das erfundene Mittelalter” (also known as phantom time hypothesis) and “Wer hat an der Uhr gedreht?”
(“Who has turned the clock?”). He critically compares the written
evidence with the archaeological and architectural findings of the time.
Countless contradictions come to light, which so far could not be
resolved, but only covered up (see also here).
In his book: ”Der größte Irrtum der Weltgeschichte” (“The greatest mistake in world history ”) Hans-Erdmann Korth writes:
”Scientific data refute the ancient
year count! See for yourself: There is not one event in Greco-Roman
Antiquity the traditional date of which could be independently verified.
For quite some time now, new evidence has been discovered that the
common dates of the ancient world are three centuries too old. Stars,
C14, tree rings, ice cores, as well as doublings confirm these doubts
about the traditional calendar. How could this happen?”
Of course, we cannot and do not want to go into detail here about the
findings mentioned in the quoted books and articles, and of course we
cannot claim that the quoted critical books are correct in all points,
or even that the official academic science deliberately spreads only
falsehood. A discussion of these innumerable results is not even necessary for the purpose of this analysis and would only be a distraction.
We have quoted these writings only because they show, by way of
example, the shaky foundations on which all historically oriented
sciences stand. We could have also proved this with the compelling
evidence that there is not even any correct, reliable knowledge about
present-day events or the recent past, although these are taking place
in front of our eyes. In the following, we shall examine what the actual
root cause of the largely deficient human historiography is.
We don’t need to go too far for that and only have to ask the historians, archaeologists and earth scientists a single question:
“What is your definition of TIME?”
However, this question is not explicitly answered –
it is tacitly assumed that the time on which the historical sciences are
based corresponds to the current standard conception of time as defined
by Joe Six-pack. The fact that time is a relative (relativistic)
concept and that people’s understanding of time varies according to
their consciousness, level of education and cultural background is not
taken into account.
‘‘Time passes everywhere at the same
pace, one should actually think. And yet we are mistaken, because time
is actually an idea and the mechanical measurement of time is an
invention from the 14th century. “Europeans have the clock, we have the
time”, says a Kenyan proverb. In the past, people dealt with time
differently. It was primarily based on the natural sequence of time,
such as day and night, sunrise and sunset. And even today, we still have
the most diverse perceptions of time in the world’‘,
writes Friedrich Popp, Managing Director of the Foreigners’ Advisory Council of the City of Nuremberg.
”Absolute, True, and Mathematical Time, of itself, and from its own nature flows equably without regard to anything external, and by another name is called Duration: Relative, Apparent, and Common Time is some sensible and external (whether accurate or unequable) measure of Duration by the means of motion, which is commonly used instead of True time; such as an Hour, a Day, a Month, a Year… All motions may be accelerated and retarded, but the True, or equably progress, of Absolute time is liable to no change.”
I. Newton, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica; translated from Latin by A. Motte, London, 1729.
With these words, Isaac Newton (1642 – 1727) described “absolute time”, which he defined as “true and mathematical” contrary to the “relative apparent and common time”
humans refer to in daily life. Newton was of the opinion that absolute
time was something that could be taken for granted – as an “immutable”
quantity of nature – and did not need further explanation.
The reason for this is simple. Newton describes nothing other than
the idea of time in classical mechanics that is still innate in all
humans, most of whom cannot comprehend the theory of relativity dealing with relativistic time and space.
The latter discipline is a correction and further development of
Newtonian classical mechanics, precisely because scientists realised
that the absolute time of Newton did not exist. Hence, according to the
tacit agreement of all conventional social scientists and in particular
of all historians, who neglect the theory of relativity, there is only
one time that runs evenly everywhere in the universe and by default in
the history of mankind. This is already a grievous theoretical and
cognitive mistake of historical sciences that should be addressed at
this place from the position of accepted physics.
According to Newton, absolute time has three characteristics:
– it is universal, which means there is only one time, which is the same everywhere;
– it is regular in the sense that it does not change, i.e. it does not accelerate or retard;
– it exists independently of all other things associated with humans and thus pertains to divine Nature.
For further reading I recommend the thorough discussion of Newton’s ideas on time and space by Georgi Alexandrov Stankov in Volume II (section
8. SPACE-TIME CONCEPT OF PHYSICS, chapter 8.1 CLASSICAL MECHANICS,
page 333). Essentially Stankov proves that Newton refers in his
definition of absolute time and space (as one cannot define time without introducing space simultaneously in a circular manner)
to the empty, free of energy Euclidean space in classical mechanics
where all observations of gravitational interactions are described. It
is the abstract reference surrogate of „absolute time” and “absolute
space“ to which all other physical motions are compared by the method of
geometry according to the principle of circular argument.
It is the primary inertial reference frame of all reference frames, in which the false Newton’s law of inertia (1st law) holds true. This law stays, however, in an apparent contradiction to Newton’s second and third law, and the law of gravitation
describing gravitational force as the origin of acceleration. While the
first law of inertia based on absolute time is a mathematical fiction,
the other laws of classical mechanics assess true physical reality where
gravitation as energy exists.
Thus, Newton’s classical definition of absolute time, which is also
uncritically adopted by all historians, builds a fundamental paradox
between the first law of inertia and the other laws of gravitation in
classical mechanics. This cardinal blunder of Newton has been eloquently
summarized by the famous physicist Born:
“Here we have clearly a case in which
the ideas of unanalysed consciousness are applied without reflection to
the objective world.“
In “Einstein’s Theory of Relativity“, Dover Publ., New York, 1965, p. 57-58.
Born’s conclusion is undoubtedly valid for all historians,
archeologists and social science researches who uncritically and, for
the most part, unconsciously adopt Newton’s absolute time and space as
an unquestionable fact, although this is not even true in physics as we
have shown above.
This hypothetical time of Newton is currently also called linear time.
Historians could have implicitly referred to Isaac Newton in their
theoretical disquisitions and we don’t know if they ever did, as none of
them display any true knowledge of physics. Nor do we know whether
historians have even thought about what time (and space) truly is, although
this phenomenon is at the heart of their science, but it is an
undeniable fact that there is no theoretical discussion about this topic
in all their books and articles in scientific journals.
This objection stems explicitly from the fact that not even
physicists can give an accurate answer to the question what space and
time is as they do not even know what energy is, although their entire
science is ultimately about describing interactions and exchange of
energies. First and foremost, they have failed to realize that they can
only assess and measure energy as space-time by artificially separating
it into space and time, and that time is, therefore,
merely a sensory perception of energy, as this has been conclusively
proven by Stankov in his new physical and mathematical theory of the Universal Law.
Scientists obviously have a general habit of not caring at all about
the theoretical – philosophical and epistemological – foundations of
their sciences.
This omission also affects mathematics, which has been in its ”foundation crisis” for almost a century, which could only be ended by the discovery of Stankov’s Universal Law.
These theoretical topics concerning a valid definition of time are
now open for a debate. Given the vagueness of current scientific
terminology and the tradition of imposing rigid doctrines in science in
the 20th century, it is uncertain whether they can ever be answered
unambiguously by conventional scientists, unless they begin to study and
implement the new theory of the Universal Law.
Currently, most of the studies explicitly dedicated to the history of
time do not even address these problems: Instead of a systematic
analysis of time, many works that have “time” in their title and often
adopt a longer diachronic perspective offer a bewildering smorgasbord of
observations on theories of time, measurements of time, changes in
daily and work routines, as well as artistic or literary works on time,
as Rüdiger Graf writes in his astute and very enlightening essay
entitled: ”Time and the conception of time in contemporary history”.
Perhaps it would be appropriate for historians to begin with Bergson’s famous concept of la durée as
a subjective experienced time of human consciousness, from which they
would then also better understand the concept of freedom as the
physical, energetic overcoming of linear time as this will very soon be
experienced by many humans in the process of ascension.
After this lengthy, but necessary, fundamental introduction, we pose
once again the initial question about the cause of the incredible
inconsistencies and deficiencies in historiography, pre- and early
history, archaeology and earth history, especially in relation to the
experiences and evolution of mankind that disqualify them as categorical
systems of true knowledge. For example, there is very serious and
well-documented evidence that man and dinosaurs populated the earth at
the same time and that the Darwinian hypothesis of the evolution of man
is completely wrong (here):
”….In retrospect, to maintain that
the human physical wonder consisting of a cellular accumulation of 100
trillion cells and metabolizing at quantum levels with the speed of
light and only to arise from a primordial organic ooze affected by Darwinian-proposed natural selection
forces over millions of years imparts a pretentious gullibility to the
extreme. The religious-based converse of that argument that humanity was
created some 7,000 years ago is also an exercise in absurdity as
documented in the geomorphological record”.
Patrick Amoroso, The Epiphany of Dr. Carl Sagan – A Gnostic Remembrance
We will show in the following that the main cause for all the historical errors in science lies in the wrong conception of time. Let us adopt the holistic perspective: Everything that exists – also called All-THAT-Is – consists of energy. There is only energy and everything else – including linear time – is an illusion of our limited perception within the 3D world we live in. Humans perceive this energy as space-time.
According to Stankov’s Universal Law, All-THAT-Is is a closed system
that consists only of energy. This system is composed of different
energies, which interact with each other, i.e. they are open. These are
U-subsets of All-THAT-Is and contain themselves as an element. All parts
are U-sets of the Whole. There is nothing else. In other words, there
is the unity of All-THAT-Is and the variety of different energies that
interact harmoniously within it, which are perceived as parts (U-sets)-
systems and levels – thereof.
For the definition of space-time as energy/frequency read: “Realitas infinita part II’‘
One of these U-subsets is the energy system in which we live in – the
earth – and of which we are a part. This system represents a special
case, an experiment so to speak, whose expansion and cause will not be
discussed at this place (read here and here).
The living beings in it – including us – are held captive in this
system and the exchange with other systems is very limited. About the
topics ”Concept Time and Quarantine on Planet Earth” read here.
We live here on earth to have certain experiences and expand our
consciousness beyond its initial limitation. The conditions and the
learning processes are at times very stressful and frightening because we have forgotten who we are and that this is only a temporary experiment (see the video “Understanding the Book of Life”).
The crucial point is that we have to go through many incarnations
within a kind of bubble around the planet Earth or Gaia until we redeem
ourselves because the experiment has been successful and we have
attained higher consciousness. However, these incarnations do not take
place one after the other in linear time but simultaneously,
they are in constant interaction with each other and represent
different frequency bandwidths/ timelines/worlds of experience of the
incarnation experiment ”Earth”. Our incarnations are multidimensional and simultaneous.
These many frequency bandwidths (ranges) have subjectively a
beginning and an end. We humans create them by choosing from the
infinite possibilities (= different, alternative frequency ranges as
parallel realities or probability worlds with a specific information)
the one alternative we want to experience. The soul decides whether the
choice of the incarnated personality, defined as free will, fits into
her overall plan and she is the one who allows or prevents the choice.
Every time we make a decision, we activate/ occupy other frequency
bandwidths of different probability alternatives. We can consciously
decide which scenarios we want to experience, provided we know and use
this inner ability to create our reality. The process is unconscious for
most people, but is always controlled by the soul. When one of these
scenarios has fulfilled its purpose, it dissolves or rather goes into
the background. Hence there is always a temporal component in the
perceived experience, the true nature of which will remain unknown to us
as long as the human mind is attached to the brain, whose neurons
function very slowly and can only experience linear time as a sequence
of events and not in their true simultaneity.
Imagine a giant cluster of frequency bandwidths that intertwine and
pulsate together. Many different alternative behaviours and destinies
are tried out for each person at the same time and influence each other simultaneously, but are perceived by the incarnated personality as a chronology of events.
In this way we experience the past as history.
How can historians construct from this multidimensional conglomerate a
single linear timeline that is binding for all the people on the
planet?
This is a totally impossible task. This linear time does not exist at all.
That is why every attempt – no matter how subjectively pure the
intention may be – is a priori doomed to failure. Not only every human
being, but also every culture and every geographical area is constantly
”on the move” to infinite different frequency ranges which evade the
attentions of the historian and are not presented in his history of
mankind. Hereby the intrinsic limitations of human language – oral and
written – as a communication means among humans and between generations
(as books and other written artifacts) play a decisive role in the
distortion of what really occurs.
When the long-awaited ”revelations” about the true history of mankind
in the sense of apocalypse will be announced any time soon, there will
be no new generally binding historical narrative. Based on the Akashic
chronic – where everything is energetically recorded – questions can
only be answered intuitively on an individual level. For example,
someone might ask whether his frequencies overlap with a certain other
person in the past or whether he/she has learned certain techniques in
another world of experience which can then be transferred to other
frequencies/lives. Tesla, for example, made his inventions known to us
intuitively – his soul has acquired them on other higher evolved
frequency realities and has passed them onto the frequency bandwidth of
the earth at the beginning of the 20th century as to foster
industrialisation of mankind. One could also find out, for example, how
much reptiloid blood he carries and under which conditions he was cloned
by the Anunnaki – probably by Enki and Ishtar (read here).
In the broadest sense, humans will very soon take notice of their
many simultaneous incarnations on other planets/solar systems or
galaxies, such as Pleiades, Arcturus, Andromeda (Galaxy), etc. That is why this treatise is of such great actuality and importance.
If you want to understand the gnostic background, you should read the
three articles ”Realitas infinita” quoted above as we do not want to
repeat ourselves here.
Historians create their (in)accuracy problems by themselves because they start from the illusory idea of time.
They impose their one-sided idea of linear time over the whole system
of human history that does not fit at all – it is the “Procrustean bed”
to the real size of human existence. That is why predictions and
forecasts are usually uncertain or even wrong, even when they come from
higher dimensions of consciousness / frequencies, because the illusory
idea of linear time is not taken into account. Most channeled messages
carry this deficiency. Often it is also the case that the predictions
do, indeed, come true, just not in the respective frequency range in
which the observer is currently located. For instance, a predicted Third
World War or a magnetic pole reversal by some gloom-and-doom experts
has already taken place on lower timelines, while the people who have
moved/ ascended to higher vibrating worlds of experience with a better
outcome were spared this negative experience.
If the prophets also move to such higher frequency bandwidths, then
they experience the failure of their forecast as is the case with all
competent financial experts who have correctly predicted the ultimate
financial crash each year since the last bank crisis in 2008, but were
lucky to evade it. Would they be able to understand the
multidimensionality of all existence, they would know that with their
precise analysis of the financial crisis they have avoided its negative
experience for themselves and the parallel humanity they have taken with
them on such new higher timelines (read also here).
This is what we observe increasingly in the last decade since the veil
to the higher dimensions has been constantly thinning after the
ascension of Gaia to 5D at the stargate 11.11.11 (November 11, 2011) and
then the ascension of a portion of humanity at the stargate 12.12.12 to
12.21.12 (December 12 – 21, 2012).
The fact that intentional lies and deceptions are all too often
inserted into the official published history of mankind is very well
known and is mentioned here only in passing. The victors always write –
understand falsify – history, this is a well-known
fact. If you enter ”fake history” in Google, you get 909 million entries
… This shows very clearly that the blindness of the historical sciences
really exists and is ubiquitously acknowledged. It is not an “exotic
topic” of this article.
By the way, many so-called historical personalities, revered as
founders of world religions, are in fact mythical figures: Abraham,
Moses, Jesus, Krishna, Buddha, etc. However, since religions attach
great importance to their historical roots, these personalities usually
appear in their historiography as actual physical incarnations, however,
capable of performing miracles which normal mortals cannot and are thus
in awe (see the books of Acharya S. alias D. M. Murdock).
Each society consists of a different composition of souls who are on
different frequency bandwidths with different levels of consciousness.
In the history of Europe, for example, we witness a society in which the
worlds of experience were dominated most of the time by baby-, child- and, above all, young souls who
were in the majority. That is why these souls could shape the society
according to their bellicose needs as an expression of their utmost
separation from the soul and the source and impose their views, usually
ruthlessly, on the few mature (ripe) and old souls.
In the current End Time the number of ripe and old souls has increased
in Europe as this continent is about to ascend very soon, while their
percentage is still very low in most parts of the world. That is why
there is a great willingness for fight and war as we witness these days
in the Middle East, which is overwhelmingly populated by bellicose child
and young souls.
Human history reports from the point of view of the ruling class of
the young souls. From the point of view of the mature souls a much
different narrative would result and again a completely different one
from the point of view of the old souls as this essay transpires. This
can be very well observed today when one compares the fake MSM news
dominated by child and young souls with the more contemplative and
ethically tainted narratives of the political events by alternative
critical writers, who are mostly ripe souls and a few of them old souls.
These are like two worlds that never meet and this indicates the
ongoing separation of the soul population in those who will ascend and
those who will continue with their incarnation cycle on lower 3D
timelines.
As the age of souls changes in different historical epochs, the
general view of history also changes constantly, as the world view of
the predominant soul age in a particular epoch fully asserts itself.
After all, the past is only experienced and thus created
from the Now point, because all incarnations exist simultaneously. This
conclusion already turns the conventional view of human history upside
down. Watch also the following videos:
It is understandable that the official historiography reflects the
views and the attitude towards life of the ruling class (mostly young
souls), because they have the power and therefore the decisive influence
in the society. For this reason history books are full of wars,
conflicts and struggles. Hollywood with its movie plots mainly depicting
senseless violence and immorality is a paradigmatic case in this
respect. Cultural and true religious history only plays a subordinate
role. The philosophical ideas that initiated decisive epochs, such as
Neoplatonism (classical Gnosis, Plotin as the successor of Plato and
Aristotle) for the emergence of the Renaissance (in the Neoplatonic
Academy in Florence) play almost no role in current conventional
historiography, just as they do not exist as movie themes. It is mainly
reported about power (abuse) through the use of violence, money
(robbery, looting, exploitation) and sex (promiscuity, abuse,
oppression, sexual aberrations) and how many people were murdered by the
evil enemies or vice verse by our glorified hero (While the Iranian
general Suleimani, who was cold-bloodedly assassinated by Trump and the
Americans is considered a hero and a martyr by all Shiites, he is
regarded as an evil terrorist by most Americans. Respectively, while
Trump is glorified for his heinous deed by his supporters in the USA, he
is considered the satan (Shaitan)
by most Muslims. These are two irreconcilable narratives of the present
and it is anyone’s guess which one will be adopted as the official
history doctrine.)
With the title ”the Great” mainly warlike men are rewarded; or have
you ever heard of Mozart the Great, Leonardo Da Vinci the Great, Rubens
the Great or Plato the Great? Even if this title is given to women, e.g.
Catherine the Great, they are almost always ruthless rulers. How about Hypatia
the Great? Even such villains as Barack Hussein Obama receive a Nobel
Peace Prize, notwithstanding the fact that he fought seven wars every
day of his presidency and boasted how good he is at killing people (read also Obama’s Final Drone Strike Data).
Historians follow strictly predetermined political, religious and
ideological rules that are agreed upon by the scientific community. For
different epochs/cultural circles, various ”methodologically
permissible” evaluation categories are defined in the sense of the last
paragraph. This means that there is no neutral, open-end research in science at all.
From the outset, certain representations are frowned upon and are
excluded – unless the researcher in question is a private scholar who
finances himself/herself and who also has no problems, if he/she is
unjustifiably rejected or attacked because he/she thinks in a
politically incorrect, that is, free spirit way.
One of these ”forbidden” historical topics and representations is the
direct influence of extraterrestrials on the events on this planet.
Although there is an almost infinite literature on this topic and the
population has been prepared for future disclosures for decades through
films, novels and published sightings, these are not mentioned in the
official historiography so far (here).
Google’s search for “extraterrestrial aliens on earth” returns 8.9
million hits. A very well researched material about the ET influence on
Earth can be found here.
A further problem is that historians do not know what criteria should
be used to classify the evidence of other frequency ranges in
excavations over time in order to obtain a conclusive picture. Layers
lying on top of each other are, with well justifiable exceptions, always
classified as chronologically consecutive – i.e. originating from
different historical times (accordingly the deepest layers are the
oldest), because the linear time concept demands this kind of logic. But
if the very foundation regarding time is not correct, the logic that
builds on it is of no use at all. If the concept of simultaneous worlds
of experience/frequency ranges is well understood, then other
interpretations of deposits appear possible or even necessary.
Admittedly, however, these still elude human understanding at present.
Even if there is no solution yet, it is still necessary to address this problem in the first place.
We understand that the historical sciences have not yet made any
effort to expose their concept of time as illusory. Stankov’s Universal
Law now makes it possible for the first time in human history as we know
it to introduce a new, well-founded concept of time and throw the old
ideas overboard. Above all the historical sciences will take an enormous
upswing because after ascension it will be possible for many people to
read the Akashic Chronic or visit other frequency bandwidths (timelines,
new worlds) by themselves and immediately find an answer to all open
historical questions that cannot be clarified by laborious excavations,
deciphering and interpreting old, often falsified writings and the
evaluation of coins, objects of art, buildings and other material
artifacts.
An increasingly larger partion of humanity is currently on frequency
bandwidths that allow an exit from the 3D matrix of the aforementioned
bubble, because the consciousness in these frequency ranges is
sufficiently high and the incoming cosmic energies allow the long
awaited ascension and enlightenment. Human evolution goes from 3D to
higher 4D or 5D earths (read here).
People jump, so to speak, on their highest – always existing –
frequency range and realize their true potential as free
multidimensional souls / energies.
In other words, the bubble is bursting, the old 3D matrix is
dissolving, the associated low frequency bandwidths as well, the
experiment ”Prison Planet Earth” is coming to an end, or is continued
with a smaller number of souls/people/personalities on lower levels of
consciousness who want it that way.
In this context it is our special concern to point out the following: As in the parable of the sower in the New Testament (Matthew, 13,1-13,9),
people with the most divergent states of consciousness grow together in
the earthly bubble. There are always overlaps/ interceptions with
different frequency ranges. Or to put it otherwise: in this polarized
world good and evil, rich and poor, peaceful and militant, clever and
stupid meet together, so that the resulting friction makes it possible
to gain knowledge. This means that even the ”pitch-black, bitterly evil
representatives of the reptilian cabal” only play the role that was
intended for them in order to help awaken the slumbering masses.
In the Indian Bhagavad Gita there is a wise saying: ”The wise do not
lament the living or the dead. The wise man knows that it is only He who
dwells in everything”. This would say that everything we encounter is
part of the great experiment “Earth”, and that all the actors can go on
”in the end”. The wise remains an untouched observer in every moment.
Meher Baba says: ”There is no evil, only different degrees of good”,
which all boils down to the same thing: You can learn from everything.
There is no absolute evil. Basically, there is no evil or good – there
is only energy in an infinite multitude of frequency ranges. All
evaluations come from illusory human thinking in 3D.
Finally, a personal remark. The blindness of the historical sciences
has been well known to me for over forty years. I was ”then” professor
at the University of Giessen, Germany on a very well-endowed and
permanent position as geographer/geomorphologist with emphasis on the
Near East and India as well as on fluviatile, aeolian and glacial land
formation in arid and semiarid regions. My concern then, as now, was the
same: I wanted to find out ”what holds the world together at its core”
and especially how planet Earth has developed in the foreseeable past.
It became clear to me that this goal could never be achieved with the
means and approaches of historical-scientific research within the
academic community. Therefore, I quit my job and turned to other sources
of truth-finding, which today lead me to the fulfillment of my
scientific life goals.
After completion of the manuscript I was made aware of the Mandela Effect, which is officially designated as “false memory” by the guardians of the linear time dogma (see also here).
The Mandela effect bears its name because when the death of Nelson
Mandela was announced in 2013 a very large number of people remembered
the death of Nelson Mandela in South Africa’s prison in the 1980s, 90s
or even later. Accordingly, there was a great astonishment at his
”second” death.
The orthodox explanation for this process is of course memory
impairment. However, in the light of the aforementioned and the three
essays ”Realitas infinita” quoted above, it is a memory overlapping from
other frequency ranges in many individuals, who are now awakening to
their multidimensionality. In these lower frequencies timelines Mandela
died in prison and never made it to a prime minister of South Africa as
on this highest timeline / frequency bandwidth, which was the best
possible outcome for him and his country deeply divided by racism. In
this context, one also speaks of “bleeding”. Such multidimensional
memories are not unusual, actually it happens more often than people
believe or admit. In the discussion about the Mandela effect on numerous
internet pages the influence of parallel worlds is actually considered.
* * *
* * *
